Recent Posts

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / Publications
« Last post by ddauber on January 19, 2017, 05:48:32 PM »
ER-10X Extended Bandwidth Research Probe System, by Iseberg, S, et al., AES 58th International Conference: Music Induced Hearing Disorders (June 2015)
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17781

Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns, by Rasetshwane, D. and Neely, S., JASA Vol. 138(4), 2246-2255, October 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4930948

Measuring Temporal Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions at High Frequencies, by Charaziak, K and Shera, C, ARO Meeting 2015 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272488937_Measuring_Temporal_Suppression_of_Clicked-Evoked_Otoacoustic_Emissions_at_High_Frequencies

Temporal Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Measured Over a Wide Frequency Range, by Charaziak, K and Shera, C, ARO Meeting 2016 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295009960_Temporal_Suppression_of_Clicked-Evoked_Otoacoustic_Emissions_Measured_Over_a_Wide_Frequency_Range

Removing effects of ear-canal acoustics from measurements of otoacoustic emissions, by Charaziak, K, and Shera, C, JASA, Vol. 139(4):2074, April 2016
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302070369_Removing_effects_of_ear-canal_acoustics_from_measurements_of_otoacoustic_emissions

Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions, by Charaziak, K, and Shera, C, JASA, Vol. 141(1):515-531, January 2017
http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4973618

Effects of Ear Canal Acoustics on Sound Calibration and Otoacoustic Emission Measurements, ARO Meeting 2017
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313973935_Effects_of_Ear_Canal_Acoustics_on_Sound_Calibration_and_Otoacoustic_Emission_Measurements

Eartip Modification Greatly Reduces Evanescent Waves, by Siegel, J and Neely, S(2017).,? ARO Meeting 2017.
http://audres.org/stn/ARO/ARO2017c.pdf

Intensimetric detection of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with ear canal calibration, by Sisto, R., Cerini, L., Sanjust, F. and Moleti, A., JASA 142, EL13, July 2017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4990011

Quality metrics for Th?venin-equivalent acoustic source parameters, by Noorgaard, K, et al, AAS Meeting 2018.
http://www.interacoustics.com/krng_poster_aas2018.pdf

Quantifying undesired parallel components in Thévenin-equivalent acoustic source parameters, by Kren Rahbek Nørgaard, Stephen T. Neely, and Daniel M. Rasetshwane, JASA  Vol. 143(3):1491-1503, March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5026796

Evanescent waves in simulated ear canals:  Experimental demonstration and method for compensation, by Jonathan H. Siegel, Kren Rahbek Norgaard, and Stephen T. Neely, JASA Vol. 144 (4): 2135-2146, October 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5058683

Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss, by Neely, Stephen T.; Fultz, Sara E.; Kopun, Judy G.; Lenzen, Natalie M.; Rasetshwane, Daniel M., Ear and Hearing: November 5, 2018
https://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Abstract/publishahead/Cochlear_Reflectance_and_Otoacoustic_Emission.98856.aspx?sessionEnd=true

Effects of forward and emitted pressure calibrations on the variability of otoacoustic emission measurements across repeated probe fits by Tom Maxim, Christopher Shera, Karolina Charaziak, Carolina Abdala.  Ear and Hearing, March 14, 2019
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30882535

No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions, by Jordan A. Beim, Andrew J. Oxenham, and Magdalena Wojtczak. JASA Vol. 146(2): 1475-1491. August 2019.
https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.5123391

Variable-rate frequency sweeps and their application to the measurement of otoacoustic emissions, by Anders T. Christensen, Carolina Abdala, and Christopher A. Shera. JASA Vol. 146(5): 3457-3465. November 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5134058

Dreisbach Hawe, L.; Portugal, N.; Aguilar, E.; Hansen, W.; Kite, D.; McIntyre, S.; Minasian, C. Acquisition and Repeatability of High-Frequency Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions Using Two Different Calibration Methods in Newborns. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2947.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/15/2947

2
General Discussion / Firmware v1.2.0.0 Released
« Last post by ddauber on September 08, 2016, 12:13:47 AM »
A new version of firmware for the control box is out!
http://er10x.com/app/download/760995855/ER10X+USB+Control+Setup+1.2.0.0.exe

Let us know if you have any problems.
3
General Discussion / Firmware
« Last post by ddauber on March 02, 2016, 12:00:04 AM »
A new version of firmware for the control box is out!
http://er10x.com/app/download/760995855/ER10X+USB+Control+Setup+1.1.0.2.exe

Let us know if you have any problems.
4
General Discussion / ER-10X Datasheet
« Last post by ddauber on March 01, 2016, 11:57:21 PM »
Check out our new datasheet!
http://er10x.com/app/download/763359005/10X+DataSheet+2x10.pdf

Let us know if you find it interesting!
5
General Discussion / Soundcards with EMAV
« Last post by rthoma on October 16, 2015, 04:31:20 PM »
The ini file shows the configuration for Indigo and Card Deluxe. 
Use that format to setup another soundcard and adjust the settings by following the instructions in APPENDIX C of the EMAV manual.

; SomeOtherSOUNDCARD
;
DSP=W
DSP_CODE=[your card name can be obtained from the device list "F2" in EMAV or "dl" command in SYSRES]
AD_sensitivity=3566000  ; cnt/V
DA1_sensitivity=15000   ; cnt/V
DA2_sensitivity=15000   ; cnt/V
;
Pages: [1]